bar_date · SOL preflight for solo PI intake paralegals
cites every statute · escalates tolling to the attorney · refuses to be the attorney
# free tier · 3 of 3 intakes left this month
# bd 2026-09-01 · jurisdictions: 50 · statutes indexed: 214
# type "help" for commands · press TAB for guided form input
# example:
$bd >

▎ what bar_date does — and what it will not do

Every deadline you see here is derived from a hand-curated table of the actual code sections — Cal. Civ. Proc. § 335.1, Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003, N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214, and so on. The AI does not fabricate citations. If your state or claim class is not in the indexed table, the tool returns "unknown — attorney review required" instead of guessing.

When any of seven high-stakes conditions trip — minor tolling, government defendant, discovery-rule ambiguity, statute of repose, wrongful death, out-of-state incident, or prior counsel of record — bar_date refuses to issue a final calendar. Instead it drafts a short escalation memo for your supervising attorney and only unlocks the .ics export after the attorney signs off. The tool is deliberately built to be smaller than the decision.

▎ workflow, in six lines

  1. Paralegal opens bar_date at intake, types $ bd > new --state CA --claim pi --incident 2025-04-12 --dob 2010-08-03 --defendant municipal or hits TAB for the guided form.
  2. bar_date echoes back the primary SOL statute with the exact code section, the computed cliff date, and the notice-of-claim window if the defendant is governmental.
  3. If the plaintiff was a minor at incident, minor-tolling is applied per that state's tolling statute and a new tolled cliff is drawn on the runway.
  4. If any high-stakes flag trips, a red ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED band overlays the runway and a memo draft is generated.
  5. Paralegal marks "attorney signed off: [name] [date]" on the intake once the memo is countersigned.
  6. bar_date then issues the .ics with 90 / 60 / 30 / 7-day drop-dead reminders and saves the case to the firm's intake ledger.

▎ questions a supervising attorney will ask

? Where do the citations come from?
A hand-curated JSON table baked into the app — 50 states × PI / med-mal / product / wrongful-death, plus notice-of-claim and minor-tolling statutes. The AI reasons over the table only. It cannot invent a section number.
? Does bar_date make the deadline decision?
No. It computes; the attorney decides. Whenever any of seven tolling risks is present the tool refuses to ship the .ics until the paralegal records attorney sign-off.
? What about states not in the indexed table today?
The tool returns 'unknown — attorney review required' and lists the missing citations. It never fills a gap with a plausible-looking cite.
? Is this a replacement for docketing software?
No. bar_date is intake-desk preflight — SOL + notice-of-claim + tolling. Firms that need full litigation docketing continue to use CompuLaw or Aderant. bar_date is scoped tight so it costs $29/mo instead of $150/attorney/mo.
jurisdictions: 50 · statutes indexed: 214 · last updated: 2026-09-01
free 0/3 · pricing · meta engine