$ bd > pricing --show

Two tiers. No onboarding calls. Cancel anytime.

bar_date is scoped tight to PI intake preflight — statute-of-limitations cliff, notice-of-claim window, tolling analysis, attorney escalation. Priced for a solo or 2–5 attorney PI plaintiff shop that doesn't need — and doesn't want to pay for — a full litigation-docketing suite.

[ tier ]free
$0 / month
3 intakes / month · no card
  • 3 intakes / month
  • SOL cliff date w/ statute citation
  • notice-of-claim window for gov defendants
  • full tolling analysis (minor / discovery / repose)
  • on-screen ASCII date runway
  • attorney-escalation flag on every high-stakes intake
[ open terminal ]
INTAKE-DESK PLAN
[ tier ]bar_date · pro
$29 / month · flat
unlimited intakes · cancel anytime · ≈ 1/5th the price of CompuLaw per attorney
  • unlimited intakes across all 50 states
  • .ics calendar w/ 90 / 60 / 30 / 7-day drop-dead reminders
  • escalation-memo .rtf drafts (one per triggered flag)
  • prior-intake scrollback w/ `search` + `recall`
  • similar-prior-matter surfacing on new intakes
  • per-state statute-cite PDF bundle for the intake file
  • CSV export of the intake ledger for quarterly firm audit

▎ back-of-envelope

manual PDF workflow
≈ 15 min / intake
open state statute pages, arithmetic in a spreadsheet, hope the attorney catches anything missed
bar_date
≈ 45 sec / intake
cited citation, runway, escalation memo drafted, audit trail saved to the ledger
CompuLaw / Aderant
$150 / atty / mo
priced + built for 15+ attorney litigation shops with heavy onboarding

▎ what we will not do

  • ▸ We will not fabricate a statute citation to fill a gap in the indexed table. Unknown gets returned as unknown.
  • ▸ We will not ship an .ics for a high-stakes intake without recorded attorney sign-off.
  • ▸ We will not show testimonials, user counts, or “trusted by” logos until they are real. This app is new.
  • ▸ We will not upsell you into add-ons. $29/mo is the whole product.

▎ FAQ

? Is this a docketing-software replacement?
No. bar_date is scoped tight to PI intake preflight — SOL + notice-of-claim + tolling analysis. Full litigation docketing suites (CompuLaw, Aderant Milana) still make sense for 15+ attorney shops. This is what solo and 2–5 attorney PI plaintiff firms wire into their intake desk.
? How is $29/mo possible when CompuLaw is $150/attorney/mo?
Because we do one job. No motion-tracking, no rules engine for every court, no white-glove onboarding. Just: for this new intake, what is the SOL, what is the notice-of-claim window, what tolling risks apply, and does an attorney need to countersign?
? What happens if my state isn't in the indexed table?
The tool refuses to compute a fake answer. It returns "unknown — attorney review required" and lists the missing citations. It never fabricates a code section.
? Who signs off on the calendar?
The supervising attorney, always. bar_date drafts a short memo per triggered flag, and the .ics file only unlocks after the paralegal marks the intake as attorney-signed. That is the point of the tool.
? Can I cancel any time?
Yes. Stripe subscription, cancel any time from your Stripe portal. Your intake ledger stays exported to CSV if you'd like a copy before you go.
? Do you show testimonials or user counts?
Not until they are real. This app is new. When we have real customers on the record we'll cite them by name.
# built on meta engine